Skip to main content

Trio Kenwood KD-1033 turntable main bearing service

  One of my first posts in this blog was regarding the servicing of the Pioneer PL12D turntable, and that has proven to be the most popular by a significant margin. The Pioneer PL12D had its competitors, and probably the most popular alternative was the Trio Kenwood KD-1033 turntable. I use both names (Trio and Kenwood) as the company operated under different names in different markets. In the UK they were Trio, possibly because the brand Kenwood was most famous here for food blenders. 95% of a KD-1033 is similar to  Pioneer PL12D, and servicing them is very much the same process. Both are belt drive , have an AC synchronous motor,  mechanical speed change , a main bearing, sprung top deck and rubber motor mounts. the KD-1033 uses a different type of anti skate mechanism, employing a thread and weight. The plinth is shallower with an internal cross brace. One aspect that is different is the design of the main bearing, and servicing it is a little harder than a PL12D. The Pioneer main b

Trying to save energy: measure first

A common theme across this blog is reducing my household energy consumption. You will see this in my threads on lighting, computers, gadgets etc.

As I see it there are 3 reasons to do this :

1) to save money - lower bills

2) to reduce my impact on the environment - CO2

3) to reduce my impact on non-renewable energy sources (gas, oil, coal, nuclear - they all have to be mined in some form or other.

While I have Green interests, I also use a lot of energy in my household, through gas & electricity consumption, and I sometimes feel I am the environmental equivalent of a Champagne Socialist. I have computers, TV's and all the modern trappings which I'm reluctant to give up. My house is part old and part new. It's a long way from a super insulated eco-home, so I have to be pragmatic. I will never get my consumption down to super low levels, but I want to try and reduce it as much as possible.

Measure it

How much energy brings me to the first issue in saving energy which is how to measure it. If you don't measure how much you use, how do you know if you are making things better or worse through changes in behaviour or technology ?

You could look at the amount you pay on your bills, but this is misleading. Bills vary with tarrifs and are often estimated. It's common practice in the UK for energy companies to estimate bills and have a single reading to reconcile actual with predicted. Energy prices vary, mostly up, so you could be using less but paying more than you were.You have to look at consumption rather than cost.

There are a number of ways of measuring your consumption. The simplest and cheapest is probably to read your meters (gas, electricity, oil) once a week. Record the number and subtract it from the following weeks reading to see the weekly consumption. If you divide by 7 you have an approximate daily consumption. You can chart this over time. You could refine it with other factors, for example external temperature - there will probably be a correlation between consumption and colder weather.

You could take this further and record the readings daily. This might be excessive BUT it also might show trends which, in turn, might suggest the main causes . In my house, Sunday and Monday tend to be the days of highest electrical consumption. This is due to heavy use of oven and washing machine on Sunday , and more washing on Monday. Electric ovens and washing machines are both heavy users of electricity.

As you employ strategies for reducing your energy consumption i.e low energy lighting, you should see a decrease. You can do this on paper or build a simple spreadsheet.

It's a a good thing to do. You need to read the meter at the same time each week (or day) to make a fair comparison week by week.

All units being equal

A further refinement is to convert everything to the same units so you can see the total energy consumption across gas, electricity or oil, assuming your household uses a combination. If you are all electricity for heating, hot water and lighting, then you can ignore the next bit - your life is simpler. Electricity is measured in kilowatt hours, gas in cubic meters or cubic feet, oil in gallons or litres

Now you could ask why does this matter ? If I can see the rate of use of each, and see if consumption goes up or down, why does it matter if this is expressed in different units.

A fair point. I think it's easier to understand your consumption as a whole by establishing a total figure. While you may take measures that reduce your consumption of electricity i.e turn down the stat on an electric heater, there is no real saving if this increases the amount of other fuels you consume. Other fuels may be cleaner or cheaper or impact the environment less, but my objective is a total reduction first and foremost.

An example of this might be the replacement of conventional filament 100 watt bulbs with low energy equivalents. Pretty simple stuff , swap a 100 watt bulb for a 12 watt equivalent. I've saved 88 watts or 0.088 units every hour they are on. However filament bulbs are inefficient because much of that 88 watts went out as heat. If my house heating has to work harder because of this, it's not as bigger a saving as I thought. Perhaps a too simplistic example, and we could discuss the relative merits of gas Vs electricity as a fuel and it's relative environmental impact. This has been done elsewhere , my objective is to measure what I use , and converting everything to the same units can only help to clarify.

Gas
While electricity is conveniently measured in Kilowatt Hours at the meter - the standard unit of energy consumption , gas and oil are measured and metered in units of volume. To compare the amount of energy you are using from electricity with the amount from gas or oil, you have to convert the latter into units Kilowatt Hours. This is a bit more complex as a unit of gas or oil may give out different amounts of energy when burnt, depending on it's calorific value. Just like food, gas has a a calorific value i.e the amount of energy given off if burned, and this varies slightly depending on where it came from and differences in the processing.

You can convert the volume units from the gas meter to kWh using fairly simply process :
  1. Take the units used as reported by the meter
  2. Multiply by the metric conversion factor (2.83)
  3. Multiply by the volume conversion factor (1.02264)
  4. Multiply by the calorific value (specified on your bill, something like 39.47333 , but will vary across regions )
  5. Divide by the kilowatt hour conversion factor (3.6)
Oil

For houses that use oil, it's even harder. I have not found a formula, and again , I can see that the calorific value of a type of oil will affect the energy produced. I found this on a web site as a very rough guide

heating Oil is 10 kWh/ltr



A simpler solution

If all of this conversion seems too hard then fear not. There are plenty of resources on the web which can do the conversion for you. I use imeasure , which is a site run by Oxford University. You just type in your meter readings and it does all the conversion, subtraction and charting for you. Once a week I enter my readings into their site. I can also see how my type of house compares with similar properties. I even get an Energy rating, which I'm ashamed to say wobbles between an E and an F - remember I said I was interested, I didn't necessarily say I was good at energy reduction. But I am trying.

The next blog will be on interpreting the measurements

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Restoring a Pioneer PL-12D Turntable

 I got back into vinyl records about 18 months ago, and have collected a few hundred albums, mostly second hand. I have a number of turntables (NAD 5120, Ariston QDeck, Pioneer PL12D ) which I got also second hand. I keep a few, some end up passed onto friends, some that are too far gone are kept for spares. In most cases they have required a little work to get them running again. Last week I was lucky enough to get a Pioneer PL-12D turntable from freecycle. The lady who offered it, said that she in turn had received it from freecycle , and had replaced the belt but couldn't get on with the springiness of it, and had got a modern USB turntable. I have previously worked on one of these decks, and know what she means about the suspension system used. While this blog is specifically about this particular model of deck, many of the concepts are similar to others from this vintage. Many Japanese belt drive decks throughout the  1970's shared very similar construction, so this ma

Bracing IKEA EXPEDIT or KALLAX cabinets for greater rigidity when used with a turntable

The inevitable problem, too many records. Turntable and amplifier on top Like many record collectors around the world, I have a number of IKEA cube cabinets from both their EXPEDIT (older) and KALLAX (newer) ranges. These are easy to make, cheap to buy and perfect for record storage. The system comes flat packed and uses bolts and dowels to hold the system together. If you follow the instructions  the system is strong and should not collapse. You can augment the joints with PVA wood glue for extra strength. My turntable sits on top of an EXPEDIT 2x4 cabinet, laid along the long side, with some felt feet to support it from the floor, and you can use KALLAX in the same way. It's been great but has two problems I wanted to address : 1) Because the system has no back panel, the records  can be pushed too far back. 2) While the structure is strong and fairly rigid, there was some lateral movement. With heavy equipment on top, I found that if I nudged or knocked either top side, this all

a vintage Sonab 85S / Yamaha CP-500 turntable

The Sonab 85S turntable You'll see from this blog that I'm interested in vintage audio equipment , especially turntables and speakers. I keep an eye on ebay for potential bargains, and saw this turntable listed quite close to me and for a very good price, £60 buy it now, including 45 adapter, dust bug, DIN adapter, record clamp and a very nice Shure M95 cartridge. Condition listed as very good and with the original sonab headshell. I've been interested in this deck for sometime, as to my eyes , it's a particularly nice design, with the very simple tonearm and deep chassis. I was aware that the model , from the late 70's was a cooperation between Swedish manufacturer Sonab and Yamaha. I don't know how much was contributed by which firm, but the same deck, or one very similar is also to be found as the Yamaha CP-500, though typically in teak rather than black. There were two Sonab models , the 75 and 85, the former being a manual  deck, the latter an automatic, an